Tuesday, April 12, 2011

[World_of_Warcraft_List] Re: Differences between a

 


On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:45:44 -0500, "Shiflet" <rshiflet@charter.net>
wrote:

>"Catriona R" <catrionarNOSPAM@totalise.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:90jpeaF8dqU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Heh fair enough, it's not much good on my 85 priest, since holy dmg
>> spells do more dmg for less mana, !
>
>Err, they do? In disc at 85, my Smite did around 6k damage, 10k on crits,
>and was over a 2 second cast time. Even with 5 stacks of Evangelism I never
>had a Smite hit for over 13k. Mind Spike does around 9k damage with a cast
>time of 1.27 seconds, up to 18k crits, and can get even higher with shadow
>orbs. With 3 shadow orbs and Archangel active, I've had Mind Spike crits for
>over 40k.

Now, how do I get shadow orbs in disc spec, exactly? :-P My point was
that *in Disc spec* holy spells are better than Mind Spike, since I
have no clue how it works in shadow spec (which I did say, it's
presumably much better then!) I've tried it, and most definitely get a
better dmg return for my mana sticking with smite and holy fire.

>> Ah, well, if I had the glyph I'd have even less of a mana issue, but I
>> didn't take it, preferred my fears to not send mobs running everywhere
>> ;-)
>
>Interesting, as I have the glyph, and yet, my fears do not send mobs running
>anywhere either.

Was a choice between those glyphs for the last spot, obviously...
--
EU-Draenor:
Sagart (85 Undead Priest)
Tairbh (85 Tauren Druid)
Buinne (82 Troll Shaman)
Balgair (80 Human Rogue)
Ruire (80 Blood Elf Paladin)
---
* Synchronet * Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 IBBS Games
--- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 ListGate 1.3
* The Whitehouse BBS - Tacoma, Wa - telnet://whitehouse.hulds.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
����`����,�()====[]::::::::::::::::::>*�,����`����
MARKETPLACE

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment